Let me talk a little off topic.
Some people say that this article is written in soft paper. I am not convinced or angry.
Some people think that Logitech master and Pennefather MT720 itself is not in a grade, and Logitech master ratio, there is no doubt that the MT750's shortcomings are indeed many, it can be said that the master fully surpassed, I'm blowing Luoji;
Some people think that these two contrasts are raising Rae Pak and the popularity of master.
I just want to say that Logitech needs me to blow it? MT750 Master also want me to say it?
Since it has chosen the appearance of the master, the purpose is so clear. Why can't we compare it?
The definition of soft paper should not be blowing it? The number of people who wrote posts was a swift cross-over. The advantages were everywhere, and they all became the essence. The truth is that instead of soft papers, I may still be too young. I just want to say that when I was just in the circle, I didn't know much about it when I wrote it. After I had played a lot, I didn't have to. I could just go and see it.
to sum upLet’s take a look at which wireless mice we can buy at 170-220.
Basically, some small mice, a drag two mouse, has not driven, so that the price is really good, 200 yuan wireless mouse, this appearance, this work is also fully acceptable. After all, the appearance is more atmospheric, and the feel and function are also OK.
Of course, the MT720's shortcomings are also obvious. Compared with the master, in addition to weight, only the price is left.
So, if you are considering buying this type of office mouse, this is a good choice,
If you are willing to spend money on the mouse, you can consider buying a msater 2S at a price of 4.5 times. The master is not very recommended, and the DPI is only 1600, which is not enough for me at least. I am a 1080P dual screen.
If not willing, Pennefax MT750 is also good.
After all, a penny and a shipment.
Appearance & feelWhat brought to you today is Pennefax MT750
I think a lot of people should be like me. The first reaction to seeing Pennefax MT750 is that this is not a Logitech master?
So, I'm going to compare the low-level version of the master to the success of the master.
â–² We first look at the parameters of the two products, the overall parameters are very similar, MT750 is a bit shorter, narrower, and higher than the master, but the actual grip is not much difference, my hand length is 17.5 Cm.
Then we come to analyze the details of the two products in a little bit.
â–² Take a look at the weights of the two when measured. Master is 150.5g, and MT750 is only 116.1g. This gap is still quite large. The weight of the master has always made it difficult for many people to adapt.
â–² Then look at the left and right buttons of the two products, are split buttons, but the shape is very different, mt750 in the middle part of a decorative strip of aluminum alloy, made the mouse seem to prefer to add this.
The master's keys are crisper, springbacks are more powerful, and the empty keystrokes are relatively small.
â–² The sound of the DPI button master is small, and the MT750 sounds crisp.
â–² The wheel is a bit like a metal and rubber material, but there is a groove in the middle of the master. Feel, speaking, used so many mice, I have not seen better than the Logitech's scroll wheel, MT750 wheel performance in general, the sense of scale is more obvious, rolling a little abnormal sound.
â–² look at the front, in front of the two are similar, are micro usb, the phone's data line can give the mouse charge, or very convenient.
â–² look at the side again, master has three power indicators, and MT750 is not, this feels a little bit of egg pain, can not grasp the real-time power of the mouse, somewhat do not trust.
â–² The roller master on the side is completely silent and has a very large damping. The MT750 is more like an ordinary mouse wheel.
â–² The two buttons on the side of the master are arranged vertically on the triangle. The mt750 is arranged in front and behind. Because there are measuring rollers in front, there is not so much space to place the side buttons. This leads to the fact that the MT750's side buttons are difficult to press blindly. .
â–² The side of the non-slip pattern, I was reluctant to choose the master, diamond cutting design, a lot better than a simple triangle. There is little difference in the anti-skid effect.
â–² The tail and the right side are not the same in appearance, we look just fine.
â–² Four non-slip feet are used at the bottom, but the position and shape are very different.
There are two U-shaped grooves at the bottom of the Master. The MT750 is a flat surface. Personally, I prefer the bottom of the master.
And the master has instructions next to each key, but MT750 does not, but this effect is not much.
performance
Looks like we talk about performance.
Both products support a 1 Torr 4 design, which is a 2.4G plus three Bluetooth devices. I don't have much to say about this aspect of the Master. I mainly look at how the MT750 performs.
For 2.4G, the receiver can be plugged in.
Bluetooth connection is also very fast, point to open the computer to find the device, and then press the device switch button, select the need to save the channel, and then press the code key, the computer selects the Pennefather mouse, on the OK.
â–² When switching between multiple devices, it is also very smooth. It is basically a second switch, and you can use it when you press the mouse down.
â–² The driver can customize the buttons, but can only choose the built-in preset, can not freely set the key combination or macro operation, but the egg pain is that the change button is only valid when the 2.4G connection, and the driver can not Off, one level goes back to the default setting.
Light Stand,Ring Light Stand,Photo Studio Light Stand,Mobile Phone Tripod Stand
SHAOXING COLORBEE PLASTIC CO.,LTD , https://www.colorbeephoto.com