Foreword: Before saying that it is worth buying, it can't be said. Recently, I found out that the channel made several recommendations and was used by Xiao Bian. I felt a sense of existence. The experience was too high-end. The talented student did not misunderstand the children. Something to add to it. In fact, it is mainly for the purpose of red testing . . . . . .
In the beginning before the beginning of a few things, the provincial bedding.
1. All contents in this article are subjective and represent only personal opinions;
2. The elimination of plasma seems to be the trend of the times. I did not mean to rehabilitate it;
3, I firmly believe that a penny, you want to use plasma low-end TV to counter the high-end LCD is unrealistic idea;
4, I am not only fungus or wooden eyes.
Not much talk about nonsense, the following formally began.
Background: I exchanged two TVs in the first half of the year. One was to replace the 34 village CRT TVs that had served parents for more than 10 years, slightly improving the quality of life. The other was that my new house had been loaded and unloaded and needed to increase. a television. Parents also spend less time watching TV during the day at work, and we both have very little time to watch TV.
Last year I began to visit various major power forums. To tell the truth, people inside are too high-end, and I look confused and confused. However, I finally realized that there are also differences between plasma and LCD TVs. spray). Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the two kinds of TVs, plasma TVs are more beneficial to the protection of vision. They have become the main factor that has impressed me. The family's daughter is already one year old and she can't avoid watching TV. It's all for the next generation.
The process of selection: Knowing Panasonic's plasma was the best by visiting the Home Appliances Forum, it began to pay attention to Panasonic plasma TVs at major shopping sites. The helplessness of Panasonic seemed to give up the plasma strategy. The major websites did not appear to be delighted to see the clearing and selling of blood, but it was scarce to see if the supply price rose, and they were forced to give up Panasonic.
Due to the small market share of plasma, I have no heart in my heart, so I went to the local Gome and Suning field visits. In GOME, the first thing to notice is the Samsung TV PS51F4500AJXXZ plasma TV. The salesman told me that the plasma is about to be eliminated. Whoever buys is a fool, and then I recommend a lot of domestic 4K TVs. I asked her to turn on the TV and show me the effect. There were actually TV shows playing inside. According to the salesperson, they usually said that they were empty.
Then came to Suning, Suning is not bad, Samsung plasma TVs are being sold at the counter, the salesperson is still introduced a lot of high-end LCD TVs, but the last phrase "My family and the manager is now using the Samsung TV PS51F4500AJXXZ plasma TV" Determined my determination.
Comparison of the plasma and the same size LCD on the spot (forget the model, it should be Samsung's mid-range LCD model), found that there are several characteristics: 1, the same size plasma color really can not be compared with the LCD, The color of the liquid crystal is obviously brighter; 2. The plasma has a strong sense of grain within 1 meter, but there is no difference between watching the basic and the liquid crystal beyond 3 meters; 3. The salesman turns the TV into a mute and there is no current. sound.
Purchase process: The first parent used the Suning group purchase price of 3999, the second was Suning's buying price of 3599, Suning delivery was fast, the next day arrived, the third day the installation master on the door to install. Send a few installation drawings below.
Because the background wall is a tile, there is no way to hang it up.
A few on the boot map.
Close up shot of "Large Legs"
Newly bought millet box, "jailbreak" himself, my daughter's photo is not bright?
Youku
Youku plays HD video. Is it too bloody? (The Walking Dead fragment)
The above pictures are taken by mobile phone
Experience:
1. This TV is suitable for families who only watch TV and do not often watch TV. I think it is worthwhile to buy a Samsung 51-inch TV with less than 4,000 pieces of the price.
2, the resolution 1024X768 seems to be relatively low, the quality is really rough within 1 meter, ready to start playing the game's estimate will be disappointed, but beyond the three meters to look at my wooden eye looks pretty good quality. (It's also good from the parents' reaction)
3, I do not know whether it is installation or technological innovation, the current sound did not hear. For the "burning screen" problem of plasma rickets, we haven't found much time for watching TV at home.
4, the TV has a USB and two HDMI interfaces, under normal circumstances is enough (I was a cable TV received a millet box), slightly higher for the more demanding children's shoes. What I think of the Internet's network functions and intelligence is that it's a chicken rib, and all of a millet box is set.
5. Whether or not I have no influence on my eyesight Saying that I did not dare to test the daughter, but there is no discomfort in watching an hour or two.